Liberty Counsel
NEWS RELEASE
Contact:
PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT - 800-671-1776
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
July
23, 2004
Florida
Court Holds There Is No Right To Transsexual Marriage
LAKELAND,
FLORIDA- Today, Florida’s Second District Court of Appeals issued
a unanimous opinion
holding that Florida does not recognize transsexual marriage. Liberty Counsel
represented Linda Kantaras in her appeal of an 809-page ruling issued by
lower court Judge O’Brien in Pasco County, Florida, which held that
gender was primarily a state of mind. The lower court ruled that “Michael”
Kantaras (formerly known as Margo) (“MK”), who was born female,
desires to be a man and therefore, the “marriage” between MK
and Linda did not violate Florida’s Defense of Marriage Act, which
limits marriage to only one man and one woman. Today’s opinion declares
the transsexual “marriage” void.
MK
was born in the state of Ohio as a female. Long after reaching adulthood,
MK moved to Texas after watching a program on MTV about transsexualism,
began taking testosterone, and underwent a hysterectomy and mastectomy at
the Rosenburg Clinic. Typically, female-to-male sex surgeries involve removal
of the breasts, uterus, and ovaries but do not include phalloplasty, which
is the addition of male genitalia. MK continues to have a functioning female
vagina. MK unsuccessfully attempted to change her Ohio birth certificate
from “female” to “male”, but an Ohio judge blocked
this attempt.
Linda
and MK met in Florida. At the time, Linda knew of MK’s sex operation.
MK obtained a marriage license in Seminole County, Florida, representing
to the clerk that she was a “male.” The two then married, after
which MK “adopted” Linda’s biological son. Linda was later
artificially inseminated with the sperm of MK’s brother. During the
“marriage”, Linda became a Christian and realized that her relationship
to MK was improper. MK, represented by the National Center for Lesbian Rights
out of San Francisco, filed for “divorce” seeking custody of
the children. Judge O’Brien ruled that a person’s sex is primarily
psychological and thus MK should be considered a “male”, and
therefore the union between MK and Linda did not violate the Florida marriage
or adoption law. In his ruling he stated, “Some jurisdictions prefer
to remain in the 19th Century understanding of binary sex that saw male
and female as distinct, immutable and opposite.” He further stated
that, “Marriage is fundamentally a state of mind.” Finding that
it was “unethical” to change Michael’s mind to match the
body, he stated that it was proper for Michael to mutilate his body to match
his mind. Instead, he found that Linda’s Christian beliefs were problematic
because she refused to accept transsexualism, and these beliefs could drive
a wedge between the children and Michael. Despite the unanimous testimony
that the children want to live with Linda, Judge O’Brien removed primary
custody from Linda to MK.
Today’s
appeals court decision disagreed with Judge O’Brien, stating that
Florida agrees “with the Kansas, Ohio, and Texas courts in their understanding
of the common meaning of male and female … to refer to immutable traits
determined at birth.” The opinion also stated, “[We] must adhere
to the common meaning of the statutory terms and invalidate any marriage
that is not between persons of the opposite sex determined by their biological
sex at birth. Therefore, we hold that the marriage in this case is void
ab initio.” The court also ruled that the question of whether transsexuals
are authorized to marry a member of their birth sex “is a matter for
the Florida legislature and not the Florida courts to decide.”
Staver
said, “Our client, Linda Kantaras, screamed with excitement upon hearing
of this decision.” Staver commented, “The law cannot permit
a person to change their sex like one changes clothes. This case is a tremendous
victory for traditional marriage and common sense, and represents a huge
setback for the transsexual and homosexual agenda. A few hormones and plastic
surgery do not change a person’s sex, which is an immutable trait
fixed at birth.”
###
|