Liberty Counsel
NEWS RELEASE
Contact:
PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT - 800-671-1776
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February
2, 2005
Another
Victory for Student Rights: School Officials Settle Case With Student After
Prohibiting Her From Distributing Invitations to After-School Church Event
Ft.
Lauderdale, FL – Yesterday, the Broward County School District (“District”)
entered into a settlement agreement with Christine Curran and her father.
The Currans originally filed suit against the District after Christine was
denied the right to distribute an invitation to an after-school church event
to her fellow classmates. The Settlement Agreement mandates that the School
District adopt a new policy and pay attorney’s fees and costs incurred
in the lawsuit. Christine is represented by Erik Stanley, Chief Counsel
for Liberty Counsel, and Mathew Staver, President and General Counsel of
Liberty Counsel. Liberty Counsel is a nonprofit litigation, education and
policy organization dedicated to advancing religious liberties, the sanctity
of human life and the traditional family.
Christine,
a student at Driftwood Middle School in Hollywood, Florida, took flyers
to school to pass out to her friends. The flyers were invitations to hear
a Christian youth speaker at her church, were not offensive and would not
cause a disruption. As Christine was handing out the flyers between classes,
a teacher saw her and told her she could not distribute the flyers unless
she complied with the District Policy, or she would be “written up.”
The
District’s Policy required all students to submit literature to a
school administrator for approval before distributing the literature to
fellow students. The Policy contained no standards to govern the discretion
of the administrator in determining whether to allow or prohibit literature
distribution. Worse yet, the Policy contained no time limits for granting
or denying a request to distribute literature, thereby allowing an administrator
to effectively deny a student’s right to free speech by not acting
on the request. The new Policy cures these defects by placing a strict time
limit on a school administrator’s response to a request to distribute
literature. The new Policy also prevents an administrator from denying a
request to distribute literature simply because of disagreement with the
literature.
Mat
Staver commented, “The District’s old Policy lacked guidelines
and thus allowed for blatant censorship of religious viewpoints, even to
the point of prohibiting a student from distributing an invitation to her
church. Students do not shed their right of free speech at the schoolhouse
gate. Therefore, schools must be governed by strict standards in responding
to a request to distribute literature. The District’s new Policy protects
students’ rights by limiting the ability of a school administrator
to prohibit student literature distribution. I am pleased to see that the
School District has agreed to respect the First Amendment rights of its
students.”
###
|