Liberty Counsel
NEWS RELEASE
Contact:
PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT - 800-671-1776
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
April
4, 2005
U.S. Supreme Court Accepts Post-Argument Supplemental
Brief In Kentucky
Ten Commandments Case
Washington,
DC – Today the United States Supreme Court issued an order accepting
a supplemental
brief filed by Liberty Counsel regarding the repeal of a 1999 Resolution
in the Kentucky Ten Commandments case of McCreary County v. ACLU of
Kentucky. McCreary and Pulaski Counties are represented by Mathew D.
Staver, President and General Counsel of Liberty Counsel, who presented
oral argument on March 2 before the High Court.
The
current display before the Court includes the Ten Commandments along with
other historical documents presented in their entirety as part of the Foundations
of American Law and Government display. The ACLU filed suit in 1999 after
both counties posted a single copy of the Ten Commandments. Following suit,
both counties modified their displays by adding additional historical documents,
some of which excerpted only the religious portions of these documents.
Both counties also passed resolutions regarding the second display. The
district court found the second display unconstitutional. The current Foundations
display was also subsequently found unconstitutional, and that is the display
which was argued before the Supreme Court.
During
the oral argument on March 2, 2005, Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and
David Souter questioned whether the 1999 Resolution on the second display
suggested that the purpose for the current Foundations display was unconstitutional.
Prior to reaching the Supreme Court, the ACLU never contended that the prior
Resolution should be used to invalidate the Foundations display. However,
at the Supreme Court level, the ACLU focused heavily on the prior Resolution
to argue that the Foundations display is unconstitutional. Following the
March 2 argument, both counties repealed the 1999 Resolutions. The counties
stated that prior Resolutions do not carry the force of law, and they had
already assumed that they had abandoned them. The counties also reiterated
that the purpose of the Foundations display is an educational display of
some of the documents that influenced American law and government. The supplemental
brief filed by Liberty Counsel advised the Court that the counties repealed
the 1999 Resolution and advises the Court that three of the five elected
officials in McCreary County have subsequently changed. Today the Supreme
Court agreed to accept the brief and to include it as part of the record.
The Court will likely render its ruling no later than the end of June.
Staver
commented: “It is a good sign that the Supreme Court agreed to accept
our supplemental brief, which addresses some of the questions raised by
the ACLU for the first time on appeal. The Ten Commandments is a religious
document that has also influenced American law and government. The Commandments
have become a universally recognized symbol of law. There are more than
fifty displays of the Ten Commandments in the United States Supreme Court
alone. Displaying the Ten Commandments on public property is a permissible
acknowledgment of religion. Such displays have never established religion.”
###
|