Liberty Counsel
NEWS RELEASE
Contact: PUBLIC RELATIONS
DEPARTMENT - 800-671-1776
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
April 19, 2007
The
Practical Impact of the Supreme Court's Decision on Partial-Birth
Abortion
Washington,
D.C. - Roe v. Wade is on its last leg. The Supreme Court
has given a roadmap for abortion regulation. First, states can pass
laws requiring abortion doctors to give explicit information to potential
clients about how the abortion is performed. Second, health and safety
regulations that apply to other doctors need not exempt abortion doctors.
Third, this case gives a shot of adrenaline to the pro-life movement
which will impact the Presidential election.
The
Supreme Court recognized that lack of informed consent harms women.
"[S]ome women come to regret their choice to abort the infant
life they once created and sustained. . . . Severe depression and
loss of esteem can follow."
In
a decision so fraught with emotional consequences some doctors may
prefer not to disclose precise details of the means that will be used,
confining themselves to the required statement of risks the procedure
entails . . . . It is, however, precisely this lack of information
concerning the way in which the fetus will be killed that is of legitimate
concern to the State. . . . The State has an interest in ensuring
so grave a choice is well informed.
The
Court has provided states with a unique opportunity to enact informed
consent laws to protect the unborn and also to protect women from
hasty and uninformed decisions. The abortion rate will decline when
doctors are required to accurately describe the procedure to women.
The
opinion also states that "the law need not give abortion doctors
unfettered choice in the course of their medical practice, nor should
it elevate their status above other physicians in the medical community."
States are now free to pass and enforce clinic regulations matching
those of other medical facilities. Oftentimes abortion clinics have
been subject to fewer regulations because of the fear that such restrictions
constitute an "undue burden" on the "right"
to abortion.
Anita
Staver, President of Liberty Counsel, commented: "The most important
effect of the Supreme Court's partial-birth abortion decision
could be the most lasting. What a difference one Justice makes! This
5-4 victory underscores the importance of electing a President who
will appoint judges who uphold the Constitution and the rule of law.
The pro-life community must take advantage of the opportunity to make
a lasting impact on the future of this nation. If we miss this chance
of a lifetime, we will die with the blood of the unborn on our hands.
But if we act decisively, we will witness the demise of Roe v.
Wade.
###
|