April 2002
Isn't
It About Time You Heard Some Good News?
by Mathew D. Staver
We
often read and hear of so much bad news. So many of our liberties are
under attack. In the midst of all this bad news, there is some very good
news.
I'm referring to
the Supreme Court decision known as Good News Club v. Milford Central
School District. In that case, a New York school district banned the Good
News Club from meeting on an elementary school campus after the school
day solely because of the Club's religious instruction. The High Court
ruled that since the district allowed other after-school meetings, such
as the Scouts, the school could not ban the Good News Club solely because
of its religious viewpoint. This ruling now means that Good News Clubs
and other groups can begin meeting on campus immediately after the last
bell for the purpose of teaching the Bible, sharing the gospel of Christ,
and instructing students in morals and character development. I can't
overemphasize the impact of this case.
Despite the clear
message that discrimination against religious viewpoints is unconstitutional,
some government officials still have not understood the impact of this
case. Liberty Counsel's lawsuit against the Los Angeles Unified School
District illustrates both the continuing ignorance of the Good News Club
case, and at the same time, the opportunities presented by this case.
Recently Liberty
Counsel filed suit against the Los Angeles Unified School District on
behalf of Child Evangelism Fellowship, which sponsors the Good News Club.
The district Policy, which mirrors California state law, provides that
school district facilities are open to the community for after-school
meetings. The Policy provides free access to groups like the Scouts, whose
meetings are geared toward the students attending the school. The Policy
also provides a fee schedule for other types of uses.
Last year, Nancy
Thomason approached the school district to set up an after-school Good
News Club meeting at one of the district's 426 elementary schools. Her
request to use the facilities at no charge was denied. Officials pointed
to the Policy, which stated that religious groups must pay a fee. Believing
that the Supreme Court already addressed this discriminatory practice,
Nancy provided the district with information about the Good News Club
case. School officials still refused to allow her access. Nancy was told
that her only possibility of meeting on campus would be to apply with
the Real Estate Branch.
Although convinced
that she had the right to use the facilities on the same basis as the
Scouts, Nancy did go to the Real Estate Branch, paid the fee, and has
been waiting for months for approval. From November until the present,
school officials have told Nancy each week that her application is under
review and she still cannot use the facilities. One school official stated
that if Nancy did not like the delay, she should get her own lawyer. That's
when she called Liberty Counsel and we filed suit.
Despite the Supreme
Court's ruling that persons and groups with religious viewpoints may not
be banned from public facilities open for secular meetings, some government
officials have taken the position that discriminatory fees may be charged
for religious uses. Whether a total ban on accessing the facilities or
a discriminatory fee scale, both are unconstitutional. Both are discriminatory
and both are banned. Government officials may no more charge higher fees
for using public facilities because of the religious viewpoint espoused,
than they may ban the use of the same facilities to religious groups.
Based on the Good News Club case, I am confident that we will win and
open the door for the gospel in the Los Angeles School District.
Think about the possibilities
of applying the Good News Club case around the country. To better understand
these possibilities, it's important to understand the Good News Club,
and then the possibilities can be illustrated in this Los Angeles case.
Good News Clubs are designed for elementary-age children from 5-12. These
Clubs are great after-school programs. As soon as the last bell rings,
a Good News Club may begin meeting in the same public school building,
just like the Scouts or any other after-school program. In these meetings,
children learn from the Bible, sing Christian songs and memorize scripture.
Stories of biblical characters or Christian heroes are presented in a
way that attracts the students' attention. Child Evangelism Fellowship
knows how to prepare information to meet the elementary children on their
level. The flannel boards, the story books with colorful pictures, and
the skits are already designed.
Child Evangelism
Fellowship has been around for over 60 years, is located in all 50 states,
and more than 140 countries. Not only do the young children learn the
Bible, but they are also invited to accept Jesus Christ into their lives,
and they are taught about morals and character development.
In preparing for
the lawsuit against Los Angeles, I had the opportunity to speak to many
people who have experience with Good News Clubs. One principal, who did
not identify himself as a Christian, stated that when he first encountered
the Good News Club on his elementary school campus, he saw a positive
difference in the attitudes of the students who attended the Club. When
he relocated to a new school, he personally requested that a Good News
Club be established there, because he stated many of these kids are never
taught about right and wrong. One mother, who admitted she rarely attended
church, stated that prior to her son attending the Good News Club, he
had a bad attitude and would not respect her. Now that he attends, he
has a positive attitude and he now respects his mom. He also comes home
and shares the gospel with her.
I have heard story
after story of young lives destined for misery who have been touched by
the gospel of Christ through the Good News Club. Sometimes we debate whether
teachers can talk "about" religion in public school, but understand
that a Good News Club doesn't just talk "about" religion
the adult teachers can introduce the young children to Jesus Christ and
instruct the kids about right and wrong, morals, and character. Liberal
groups opposed to these Clubs argued that allowing this kind of evangelization
on a public school elementary campus established a religion. The Supreme
Court rejected this argument, relying on the fact that these elementary
school kids must first receive parental consent. Thus, it is the parents'
choice to allow their children to attend these Clubs.
The Los Angeles School
District is the second largest in the country. There are approximately
370,000 public elementary school students in the district. These children
exceed the population of the city of Miami, Florida, Witchita, Colorado
Springs, Birmingham, Montgomery, or Macon, Georgia. The elementary students
comprise more than half the size of the state of South Dakota or Vermont.
There are 426 elementary schools in the district. These kids represent
a huge mission field. Most conversions to Christ occur between the ages
of 5 and 12.
I wonder why every
church in America does not adopt their local elementary school to start
a Good News Club. These kids are a mission field in the backyard of every
church. There is no reason why every elementary school in the country
should not have a Good News Club. You don't have to reinvent the wheel.
The materials have already been prepared by Child Evangelism Fellowship.
Training is also available. For information on how you can start a Good
News Club in your area, I encourage you to call Child Evangelism Fellowship
at 1-800-300- 4033.
We often whine and
complain about the loss of our liberties. Yet, we have a tremendous opportunity
to start Good News Clubs at every elementary school. If every school had
an ongoing Club, we could positively change the future of America through
one of two generations. Yes, you might find some resistance from school
officials, like Nancy found in Los Angeles. However, I am confident we
will win her case and open the door to present the gospel to hundreds
of thousands of young people. The Good News Club case has now given us
the high ground, and we should seize the opportunity.
|