Do Americans have equal rights, or do LGBTQ “rights” supersede everyone else’s rights? That’s a central question in the Kim Davis case.  

Liberty Counsel has filed with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, asking the court for an “en banc” review of Kim Davis’ case, meaning that we are asking ALL the judges to weigh in on this case. And the Sixth Circuit has already indicated that this case presents legal issues of “first impression” that need to be answered by the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Defend Religious Freedom with your gift today, which will be DOUBLED by a special Challenge Grant. 

Kim Davis, a modest and soft-spoken, born-again Christian who simply wants to live out her faith, has become the LGBTQ’s punching bag. She has been publicly humiliated, thrown in jail for six days, and now sued into bankruptcy because of the hysterics of two LGBTQ men who wanted to inflict harm on this gentle woman for no other reason than her Christian faith. 

Nothing in the Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, which invented a “right” to same sex “marriage,” created a right to get a marriage license from a specific person. David Moore and David Ermold could have gone to any number of area county clerks to get a license. But the two Davids refused to do so. They wanted to force Kim Davis to violate her deep faith by putting her name on their license.

Only Kim’s humiliation and capitulation, and nothing else, would do for these two men — who told GQ magazine they had never even discussed marriage before they heard about Kim Davis. They wanted Kim Davis to forfeit her religious freedom rights and be publicly shamed in the process.

We appealed that ruling, and although the court ruled against Kim, the court admitted that our case is one of “first impression,” meaning it presents a novel issue for which there is no specific legal precedent from the U.S. Supreme Court to help decide the case. In other words, the judges effectively admitted they need the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on this matter.

That’s GREAT news, because in addition to deciding if people can be sued for using their First Amendment religious liberty rights, the High Court will also be forced to reconsider the 2015 same sex “marriage” Obergefell ruling that created this mess in the first place. 

Should LGBTQ “rights” erase religious freedom rights? 

Don’t let the LGBTQ agenda erase religious freedom.
Kim’s case illustrates that the dreadful Obergefell decision has been used to create a special class of persons, the LGBTQ, who have more rights than any other person. But our Republic simply doesn’t work that way.